For years, now, females have been losing tasks after bold to express the view that biology is real and crucial.

Companies and public bodies, recorded by the demands of extremist trans activists, have exacted cruel penalties on those expressing completely mainstream - and legal - views on sex and gender.

Inevitably, tribunals have followed a number of these cases. During these, we have actually heard terrible details of ladies dealt with abominably by companies in thrall to advocates who prompted and imposed the prohibited adoption of self-ID policies when it pertained to single-sex spaces.

We've heard of ladies bullied and shunned for questioning the right of those born male to self-identify into ladies's areas, from changing rooms to domestic violence sanctuaries.

Equally undoubtedly, those women capable of resisting have actually been winning legal actions.

But even a rock solid case does not make it simple to strike back. Good lawyers are expensive and the procedure is draining, both physically and emotionally.

For each female who has actually thrived in court, there are a lot more for whom launching a legal case seemed difficult.

The facility by the novelist and benefactor JK Rowling of a fund to support ladies's legal defense of their rights immediately removes any financial barriers to action for those with feasible cases.

Author JK Rowling has actually developed a fund to support females's legal defense of their rights

The intervention of Ms Rowling should, today, be focusing minds in human resources departments across the country.

Since the Supreme Court ruled, last month, that sex, in law, was a matter of biology rather than documents, a number of organisations - in both the general public and economic sectors - have actually issued statements announcing their decisions to "consider" the ramifications for their policies.

This widespread and careless complacency stands to cost companies - and taxpayer-funded bodies - dear. The truths are basic. If a service is provided on a single sex basis that implies biological sex, not individual identity.

The law is the law and no further consideration is required in order for companies to satisfy their obligations under it.

A variety of previous legal actions after females were unjustly dismissed or bullied out of tasks for declining to agree with the mantra "trans females are women" were possible thanks to the support of online crowd-funding projects. Ms Rowling regularly promoted - and donated to - such fundraisers.

Now, she's a one-woman crowd-funder, all set to back the cases of every lady mistreated at work for speaking the truth about sex.

The JK Rowling Women's Fund will transform the battleground when it comes to females victimized for their legitimate, reality-based views.

At the heart of industrial tribunals there may be susceptible people betting high stakes but the human cost suggests absolutely nothing to the insurers underwriting companies' costs. For them, it's all about the bottom line and the possibility that every female with a case now has access to the finest attorneys in business will, I suspect, motivate numerous to prompt settlement instead of the embarrassment, and inevitable expense, of more doomed defences.

If one required proof that ladies's rights are in need of the fiercest security, it was available in the response to the launch of Ms Rowling's fund.

With scrumptious pathos, one activist attorney stated online that the Harry Potter creator had "emerged from the shadows" as the funder of what he referred to as the "anti feminist biology is destiny movement".

Ms Rowling has never remained in the shadows when it concerns her views on women's rights, has she?

Other reactions were, naturally, more violent in tone.

The continuous tribunal including nurse Sandie Peggie, declaring discrimination and harassment against NHS Fife and trans-identifying doctor Beth Upton, brought the problem of the way so called "gender vital" women had been dealt with at work to large attention. This is a case that "cut through" with the public and forced some political leaders to resolve a concern they chose to prevent.

Scottish Labour's leader Anas Sarwar and his deputy, Jackie Baillie, revealed their support for Ms Peggie and declared their belief in the significance of biological sex.

If they 'd known what they know now, they added, they would not have actually enacted favour of the SNP's ultimately doomed plan to permit anybody to self-identify into the legally-recognised sex of their picking.

But while the Peggie case and the subsequent judgment on the legal meaning of sex by the Supreme Court might have required a humiliating U-turn by the Labour management on the matter of biological truth, others remain stubbornly dedicated to defiance of the law.

Naturally, the Scottish Greens - a great Wodehousian satire of a revolutionary cell - remain committed to using single-sex areas by anyone who feels they belong to that sex.

There have actually been recent statements of resistance from trade unions, too. Unison has permitted a trans lady to run for a women-only position on its nationwide executive council.

But every act of performative defiance by well-funded trade unions - or taxpayer-funded regional authorities and health boards - is another costly legal action in the making.

It needs to not have actually been necessary for JK Rowling to ensure to underwrite the legal costs of ladies discriminated against for their views on sex and gender. Nobody must ever have lost a job, a promo, or an agreement on the basis of their view that sex is immutable and crucial.

Nor needs to the author have felt it essential to develop, in 2022, Beira's Place, a women-only support service for victims of sexual violence in the Lothian area.

Ms Rowling's choices to money Beira's Place and to underwrite the legal costs of ladies victimized for thinking in the truth of sex are acts of feminist philanthropy which, in a world not made batty by gender ideology, would have been hailed by our politicians.

I understand that acknowledgment is the last thing on the author's mind however isn't it downright unusual that, when he talks of the achievements of successful Scots, First Minister John Swinney never discusses the support Beira's Place has provided to hundreds of women?

Money is not the only thing females acting to defend their rights need. Ask anybody who has actually been through the tribunal procedure and they'll inform you that the psychological assistance of friends and allies is essential.

This comfort will not be in short supply for those ladies who get support for their cases from the JK Rowling Women's Fund. The author belongs to a worldwide network of advocates, fighting to safeguard women's rights against the demands of trans activists, and calls to action and support do not go unheeded.

Let the country's human resources departments brace themselves. A most exceptional plot twist has just been composed.